JPMorgan的行为金融学.pptx

上传人:王** 文档编号:276188 上传时间:2023-04-26 格式:PPTX 页数:49 大小:297.84KB
下载 相关 举报
JPMorgan的行为金融学.pptx_第1页
第1页 / 共49页
JPMorgan的行为金融学.pptx_第2页
第2页 / 共49页
JPMorgan的行为金融学.pptx_第3页
第3页 / 共49页
JPMorgan的行为金融学.pptx_第4页
第4页 / 共49页
JPMorgan的行为金融学.pptx_第5页
第5页 / 共49页
JPMorgan的行为金融学.pptx_第6页
第6页 / 共49页
JPMorgan的行为金融学.pptx_第7页
第7页 / 共49页
JPMorgan的行为金融学.pptx_第8页
第8页 / 共49页
JPMorgan的行为金融学.pptx_第9页
第9页 / 共49页
JPMorgan的行为金融学.pptx_第10页
第10页 / 共49页
亲,该文档总共49页,到这儿已超出免费预览范围,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

《JPMorgan的行为金融学.pptx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《JPMorgan的行为金融学.pptx(49页珍藏版)》请在优知文库上搜索。

1、Guess 2/3 of the average of the class numbers!Introduction to Behavioral FinanceApproaches to InvestingCommon biases and anomaliesEMH and biased investorsFuture of Behavioral FinancePhilosophy: Irrational investor behavior leads to market anomalies that can be exploited with a disciplined trading ap

2、proach. Behavioral investing is based on research into human behavior in financial markets.1980s: Anomalies in stock prices and new behavioral finance theory1992: JP Morgans first behavioral finance mutual fund in LondonLate 1990s: Offers wider range of mutual funds in U.K. and Europe2003: JP Morgan

3、 launches behavioral finance in the U.S.Late 2006: AUM in behavioral funds over $20 billion in the U.S. Over $76 billion worldwide.Behavioral23%Research Model17%Manager Driven34%Other26%JP Morgan U.S. Equity Retail Mutual Funds(Assets Under Management)Research Model PlatformBottom-up approach, based

4、 on analysts forecastsDividend Discount ModelRankings form basis for portfolioManager Driven PlatformCombines skills of analysts with experienced portfolio managersFundamental analysisBehavioral PlatformSeeks to add value by Identifying anomalies in pricing Consistency DiversificationMomentumValueEa

5、rnings SurpriseMergerApparent High RiskInvestment processA multi-factor model is used to create portfolios based on factors such as price momentum, earnings momentum, value and growthApplied to a range of stock typesStocks are screened for growth and value characteristics-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%1.00%

6、2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%YTD1 Year3 YearSince Inception Large-Cap CoreLarge-Cap GrowthLarge-Cap ValueMid-Cap CoreDifference between Intrepid Funds and Lipper Benchmarks by Style (Jun 2006)0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%YTD1 year3 YearSince InceptionIntrepid AmericaLipper Benchmark-5.00%0.00%

7、5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%YTD1 year3 YearSince InceptionIntrepid GrowthLipper Benchmark0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%YTD1 year3 YearSince InceptionIntrepid ValueLipper Benchmark0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%20.00%YTD1 year3 YearIntrepid Mid-CapLipper BenchmarkRepeatable, di

8、sciplined processIncreased return potentialAdded layers of diversificationComplements traditional fundsBehavioral finance fundTraditionally managed stockTraditionally managed stockOverconfidence E.G. Fadi Kanaan & Dirk Jenter - “CEO Turnover and Relative Performance Evaluation” Prospect Theory Allai

9、s Paradox Recency Effect Overreaction & Availability Bias E.G. Werner De Bondt and Richard Thaler - Does the Market Overreact?“Herd Behavior Gamble FallacyConfirmation Biases Mental AccountingAnchoring E.G. Kanheman & Tversky - “Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics And Biases” Cheap Stocks outperf

10、orm Expensive Stocks High B/M ratio, low P/E ratio, low P/S ratioStocks continue moving in the same direction News is not immediately reflected Equity Premium PuzzleGood news leads to Overly High Stock Price Bad news leads to Too Low Stock PriceMispricing Winning stocks tend to be overpriced Calenda

11、r Effect December & January EffectCheap Stocks Outperforming Expensive StocksOverconfidence &Herd BehaviorOverpaying for perceived good companies and ignoring supposedly bad onesRecency EffectInvestors assess future prospects based on recent past resultsStocks continue moving in the same direction P

12、rospect Theory Investors need more premium to invest in riskier assetsEquity Premium PuzzleNews is not immediately reflected in forecastsAnalysts dismiss new info that contradicts original assessmentAnchoring & Confirmation BiasesProspect Theory, Gamble FallacyHold on to losing stock and sell winnin

13、g stockMispricingOverreaction & Availability Bias Heavily weight decisions toward more recent info, making any new opinion biased toward that latest newsGood news drives stock price up by too much & bad news drives stock price down by too muchMental AccountingInvestors discount previously winning st

14、ocks at lower rate and vice versaWinning Stocks tend to be overvalued Investors want to avoid taxCalendar EffectCheap Stocks Outperforming Expensive StocksWinning Stocks tend to be overpriced VALUE INVESTINGStocks continue moving in the same direction News is not immediately reflected in forecastsGo

15、od news drive stock price up & bad news drive stock price downMOMENTUM INVESTINGMarket anomalies are caused by either behavioral biases or institutional imperfections, e.g. inefficient markets, temporary supply and demand imbalancesBehavioral biases and anomalies exist in all 3 forms of the efficien

16、t market strong, semi-strong, and weak Will they continue to exist or be arbitraged away? In strong-form EM: prices reflect all information available, and thus, stocks are fairly priced Irrational investors however, end up choosing stocks based on these biases lose money If they continue to act based on their biases, they will eventually be driven out of the market But: Sheer luck may enable them to stay in the marketIn Semi-Strong EM: All publicly available information is reflected in the price

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 金融/证券 > 金融资料

copyright@ 2008-2023 yzwku网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:宁ICP备2022001189号-2

本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。装配图网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知装配图网,我们立即给予删除!